Last Week In W3C Social Web

  • Archive
  • RSS
The point I wanted to make here is that, when “social data” transfers from one individual to another in a social network, even though these individuals have complied with the immediate privacy policy, there might be some other policy further up which they could be violating without them knowing. Oshani
Use Cases on Privacy and Context by Oshani Seneviratne on 2009-05-21 (public-xg-socialweb@w3.org from May 2009)

Source: lists.w3.org

    • #w3c
    • #socialweb
    • #lifestream
    • #sharing
  • 3 years ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Scoping Presence

Try it yourself now… Identify a piece of technology you are working with or developing

  • What role, if any, does presence play?
  • What is its purpose?
  • What/who are the presentities?
  • What kind of presence information does it use?
  • How is it produced?
  • How is it consumed?
  • What is the balance of presence types?
  • How might it work differently using a different pattern of presence?

From the slides of Scott about Presence

    • #presence
    • #howto
    • #context
    • #socialweb
  • 3 years ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Presence by Scott

What is presence? How do we scope it?

    • #context
    • #presence
    • #social network
    • #socialweb
    • #w3c
  • 3 years ago
  • 1
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Links around Social Web Privacy

  • Wiki User Stories around Social Web If you add more user stories to add, you could send an email to public-social-web-talk@w3.org
  • List of Discussions Topics for the Social Web XG
  • ZoneTag project used geo-tagged photos and social networks to do face detection
  • Lifelogging: Privacy and Empowerment with Memories for Life (pdf) by Kieron O’Hara, Mischa M. Tuffield and Nigel Shadbolt

    The growth of information acquisition, storage and retrieval capacity has led to the development of the practice of lifelogging, the undiscriminating collection of information concerning one’s life and behaviour. There are potential problems in this practice, but equally it could be empowering for the individual, and provide a new locus for the construction of an online identity. In this paper we look at the technological possibilities and constraints for lifelogging tools, and set out some of the most important privacy, identity and empowerment-related issues. We argue that some of the privacy concerns are overblown, and that much research and commentary on lifelogging has made the unrealistic assumption that the information gathered is for private use, whereas, in a more socially-networked online world, much of it will have public functions and will be voluntarily released into the public domain.

  • Data Republishing on the Social Web (pdf) by Claudia Wagner and Enrico Motta

    Data Republishing is a recent Social Web phenomenon which can be observed in different areas of the Social Web. However, current Data Republishing tools don’t work in the emerging context of the Se- mantic Web. In particular, these tools neither generate any semantic metadata which provide information about the republished content (e.g., provenance information) nor are they able to make use of existing seman- tic metadata annotating the original content being republished. In this work we introduce the concept of Semantic Data Republishing and de- scribe how to implement it.

  • Collective Privacy Management in Social Networks (pdf) by Anna C. Squicciarini, Mohamed Shehab and Federica Paci

    Social Networking is one of the major technological phe- nomena of the Web 2.0, with hundreds of millions of people participating. Social networks enable a form of self expres- sion for users, and help them to socialize and share content with other users. In spite of the fact that content sharing represents one of the prominent features of existing Social Network sites, Social Networks yet do not support any mech- anism for collaborative management of privacy settings for shared content. In this paper, we model the problem of collaborative enforcement of privacy policies on shared data by using game theory. In particular, we propose a solu- tion that offers automated ways to share images based on an extended notion of content ownership. Building upon the Clarke-Tax mechanism, we describe a simple mechanism that promotes truthfulness, and that rewards users who pro- mote co-ownership. We integrate our design with inference techniques that free the users from the burden of manually selecting privacy preferences for each picture. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time such a protection mechanism for Social Networking has been pro- posed. In the paper, we also show a proof-of-concept appli- cation, which we implemented in the context of Facebook, one of today’s most popular social networks. We show that supporting these type of solutions is not also feasible, but can be implemented through a minimal increase in overhead to end-users.

    • #privacy
    • #context
    • #socialweb
    • #w3c
    • #zonetag
    • #data
    • #face recognition
  • 3 years ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Lifestreams, the time of specs

Task Forces through User Stories

Christine Perey introduced the list of possible Task Forces for this Working Group. The task forces reflect people’s interests at the Social Web Barcelona Workshop. No specific task forces has been yet decided. The first effort will be to narrow the scopes of privacy, user experience, and distributed architecture through user stories.

List of Guest Speakers

To stay connected with the Social Web community, we decided to invite guest speakers. Harry Halpin proposed a first teleconference about the overlapping between FOAF and vCard. Please pick up a date among the proposed dates.

You’ve been invited to help sort out the “great” vCard in RDF and FOAF controversy, hopefully in order to get one useful RDF vocabulary that contains the basic core terms needed to describe people (call it “FOAF 2.0 - the vCard edition” if you will, although we may just have a new single version of vCard in RDF emerge as a module to be used with FOAF. Who knows?). We need to discuss what terms, solve any open issues, how to host, how to point old versions to a new version, and then how to outreach and communicate with the Portable Contacts and the current vCard IETF WG.

So many Lifestreams, OpenSocial and specifications

The Web has never been that social :)

Since March 2009, there is a group around Chris Messina in charge of developing an Activity Stream protocol for syndicating activities taken in social web applications and services, similar to those in Facebook’s stream or FriendFeed. The draft of “Atom Activity Base Schema” uses Atom as a base for the schema.

A similar effort has been going on in the Online Presence group. They are working on an Online Presence Ontology to provide the main concepts and properties required to describe information about user’s presence in the online world (e.g., on instant messaging platforms and Social Web sites).

OpenSocial is a community effort not driven by any company. There are discussions on the OpenSocial and Gadgets group.

Products, products, my life as a consumer

  • Flock 2.5 is being released.
  • Oversharing is the new trend. :)
  • Related to vCard and/or FOAF, twtBizCard, a new service for sending a business card through twitter.

General information

The second teleconferences has happened on May 13, 2009. Next one is today on May 20, 2009. You can follow the progress of the work on the Social Web XG weekly agenda. Trackbot will show you the open actions of the Working Group.

    • #w3c
    • #socialweb
    • #lifestream
    • #specification
    • #teleconference
    • #opensocial
    • #vcard
    • #user stories
  • 3 years ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

About

This is a summary of news around the activities of the W3C Working Group. (Written by Karl Dubost)
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr